Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login



As newbie in the field of investing, I've often wondered about the nebulous distinction that separates the real investors from speculators in the stock market.

This is not to say, of course, that I have not met or heard of anybody who would argue that there is a sea of difference between the two or that they are actually oceans apart and could not be mistaken from one another.

Both investors and speculators are quite capable of making their bundles in the market, but their risk taking activities are varied and sometimes they consider each other’s way of making money with disdain.


A newbie's mind like mine however has to be initiated, and an example wouldn't hurt so here is an attempt to show one example:

There is currently a big debate here in the Philippines on whether PLDT's take-over of Digitel, the smallest of the three major telcos in the country, would be monopolistic when an earlier attempt of its rival Globe was never considered as such.

PLDT is the biggest telco in this country and, though with a rather wide margin, Globe is the second biggest. You can form your opinion regarding this debate but that is not exactly what this post is all about.

This post is about the way two stock market players have reacted to that story. All three companies are listed in the local bourse and market player "A" thought this would be the best time to buy Digetel shares since it is being taken over by PLDT which is the darling of many investors who can afford its price.

PLT is trading at the moment at (PHP) Two Thousand plus (2000 ) per share while Digetel is at around (PHP) One Peso and Fifty cents (1.50) player "A" thought that Digetel could easily go to (PHP) Three Pesos per share because of the take over which is practically a done deal since both companies (PLDT and Digetel) already made the announcements and the delay is only caused by the complaint of Globe against the deal on the argument that it would give PLDT a monopoly of the telco market.


A congressional hearing is afoot due to that complaint but Player A thinks that nothing will come off it and the deal will eventually be consummated thereby pushing the stock price upwards to at least double its present value. He is therefore raring to buy the stock now!

Market player "B" on the other hand is taking a wait and see attitude. He has been watching Digetel for quite some time now. It piqued his interest not because of these latest developments but because despite its size and its late entry in the telco market, it disrupted the prevailing norms in that industry and forced the leading companies to play its game.

Digitel targeted the low end segment of the market and offered rates and plans that were so enticing that even the loyalists of the two big service providers ended up owning Digitel as their second phones.

When the two big service provider began mimicking the offers, he deicided it was time to buy Digetel stocks. He bought some of its stocks long before the gossip or the official story came out that PLDT is buying Digetel's controlling shares. But he bought with caution.

He bought its shares even as the prices fluctuated and his accumulation process is such that he is now even with the market despite the recent downturns. He is, however, not thinking of rushing into his computer terminal (he trades online) to buy more shares simply because of PLDT’s move to buy Digetel’s majority shares.

Now, are you like Market Player A or B? Are you a speculator or an investor?
19
Vote
   


Hope Orblers are not missing this

January 8th 2011 02:10
This is just a link on the inspiring story of Ted Williams. The spectacular story is not just about the man, but on how the man's life was changed by technology. By a video story posted on the net.

Really Long Link
13
Vote
   


NO MORE SAFE INVESTMENTS?

December 4th 2010 22:17
Bruxelles Bourse - pic source Wikipedia

I understand, all investments have risks, but...

A newbie has got to ask a lot of questions too, right? I mean, especially somebody who is at a loss on how to make ends meet - somebody who has to keep on working like a horse for the rest of his life, well hopefully, until he makes it to the big time – if at all.

Anyway, when this newbie started to put his nose to the grindstone and tried his darnedest to learn the ropes of investing, he was given the impression that the safest of all investing instruments is the government bonds.

As newbies, it was explained to us in a classroom that the reason the government bonds are the safest is because they are guaranteed by the government. That was not very hard to understand despite the fact that there is a possibility of default. The government, after all, is the one that prints money.

Of course, if they print more money the guaranteed income from government bonds will be subjected to other consequences such as inflation, but let us not muddle the discussion with so many things that befuddle the minds of untrained newbies.

Just the fact that German Chancellor Angela Merkel is trying to insist to change the established rules of the game, in mid-game, is more than enough to confound our already perplexed newbie minds.

I am probably being too simplistic, but I can easily understand (if true) why an article here is saying that the bonds are possibly in a turning point.

What I cannot understand is this: Greece was in trouble because of profligacy, Ireland had to be bailed out because its banks had too much exposure on the real estate boom that went bust and god knows what else the other European countries, that are said to be in trouble, did.

Amidst all the (expletives) those (expletives) decision makers did that led them to need more money than they can afford, the private investors who want safe investments were always there to tide them over – probably to give them another chance to correct their mistakes without causing too much damage – and if I may go a bit farther, to practically bail them out.

To my newbie mind, government bond holders are conservative investors (of course not all of them are) who want safe investments. That’s the reason why they have those bonds, they are supposed to be safe! They bought them because they do not want to take too much risk.

Now, when a country goes bankrupt for reasons that has nothing to do with an investor’s wish for a safe investment, why do the safe investor have to take a hit - the way Merkel is insisting they should?

Merkel’s proposal naturally spooked quite a number of bondholders, which in turn exacerbated the European financial problems.

Can anybody help us, newbies, understand why Merkel seem to be trying to solve a problem by creating another problem that worsens the situation?
98
Vote
   


WHY TOLERATE WIKILEAK'S ASSANGE?

December 1st 2010 22:36


I don’t know what his reasons are for doing what he is doing, but I think this Wikileaks publisher Julian Assange, despite the awards Wikileaks received, is an abomination to the publishing world


[ Click here to read more ]
77
Vote
   


HE FINALLY OWNS UP TO IT

September 6th 2010 00:00

Picture taken from live broadcast of ABS-CBN TV News program


[ Click here to read more ]
118
Vote
   


DEFINING RISK IN FOREX – 4

July 5th 2010 00:00
Pic source: Wikipedia
The Trend Is Your Friend?

Well, sure! Any trader will tell you that. And I am not about to argue the point. “The trend is your friend


[ Click here to read more ]
209
Vote
   


DEFINING RISK IN FOREX – 3

May 3rd 2010 00:00
Pic Sourse: Wikipedia


How To Lose It All And More
[ Click here to read more ]
121
Vote
   


DEFINING RISK IN FOREX -2

April 26th 2010 00:00
Pic source: Wikipedia


The speed by which the prices of currency pairs are changing is one of the things that make Forex a very risky endeavor – and it would serve well a novice (like me) to be aware of this fact even before he decides to try his luck in this field


[ Click here to read more ]
75
Vote
   


DEFINING RISK IN FOREX

April 13th 2010 02:30
Most Traded Currencies data source: Wikipedia

If you are just about to try Forex trading, (especially if you are planning to do it on your own on-line) the first thing you’ll notice in every website you’ll visit is the warning that says “forex trading presents substantial risk to your capital”. You’ll see it in almost every page.

[ Click here to read more ]
81
Vote
   


EVER TRIED FOREX?

April 8th 2010 05:33
Foreign Exchange turn-over. Pic Source: Wikipedia


If you haven’t tried trading forex on your own, allow me to give you some tips


[ Click here to read more ]
105
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
2 Posts
119 Posts dating from April 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Market Newbie's Blogs

7335 Vote(s)
112 Comment(s)
90 Post(s)
Moderated by Market Newbie
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]